![]() > If a software does what you expect it to do and does it well but includes a few prompts here and there for marketing purposes.is that really so bad?Īs the article mentions, the problem generally isn't any one individual change - the concern is about the sense of direction for the overall project. On the other hand, they're not entitled to my money or continued patronage because I opened an account on their service and gave a test drive. They can operate the way they want, and I'm not entitled to tell them how to operate, or force them. I found out that I have got enough of the modern web, with sites overloading my senses and doing all kinds of funny business with my information even if I pay them.įeedly is a business, they want to earn money and provide services, that's fair. $X for a year, no tracking, no funny data business, for these services. They're also paid services, and I also pay for some of them. Simplymail, Source Hut, Mataroa, Smol.pub, etc. ![]() Simple services which do one thing, and do it well. But they bombard you, and it comes down to "pay us or go away", and I went away. Add a time trial, don't sell ads, that's OK too. Turn down nagging, keep the ads, that's OK. They provide a free service, nag me, insert ads into the stream, all at the same time. As I continued using these tools, I've overgrown them, and the features they offer on subscription tiers started to make sense.Īs a result, I've directly bought the highest tier of service which both makes sense and I can afford.įeedly is different in that regard. Most notable examples are Evernote, Trello, Dropbox and Pocket. I've started all the services I pay from their free tiers. I don't agree that having a comfortable free tier inhibits upward movement in the subscription structure of a service. Shrug and reflect that those weirdos aren't costing you much.) (And in that latter case, then you'll still find one or two users who are willing to subsist on your free tier, whether that's a 3-feed RSS reader or whatever. Either give a time-limited free trial of the service or a heavily-limited version of the service that shows how it works, but that absolutely nobody would want to use at that level forever. Skip the temptation to try to eke out a little money from the free tier (because you probably won't) and think of it strictly as a trial option. For instance, as terrible as this blogger claims to have found Feedly, he used it for nearly a decade! If you offer a service with what you might call a "livable" or "comfortable" free tier, it will end up used as heavily as you allow by people who will cost you resources indefinitely, but who are far more likely to switch to another free service than to ever pay you a cent. ![]() My guess is that a person who subscribes to the entry level of a product is more likely to be upsold to something else than a free user is going to even think about paying. If I host it myself, then I don't have to pay anyone for hosting my feeds, and I'm not supposed to be targeted by marketing campaigns to pull money out of my wallet on a daily basis. Thats the reason why I moved from Feedly to a self-hosted Miniflux instance (and Nextcloud News before it). And of course I understand that they also need to make money, but they should also respect those who simply want an RSS reader and are insensitive to all these campaigns. I feel like being approached every day by a dude who wants to sell me a vaccum cleaner that I don't want. I personally felt very annoyed by Feedly nagging me on a daily basis to upgrade in order to get features that I didn't need and never asked for. But I'm not among those people, and many other people are not. Some people may only care about the information they eventually get, not HOW they get it. AI-curated feeds, integrations with X or Y, nudges to let go of RSS entirely for some applications and instead use whatever integration they've come up with. The problem is that companies try to monetize RSS, and the only way of doing so is to provide features that RSS can't offer. Monetizing RSS is like trying to monetize HTTP.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |